points by verdverm 3 days ago | 0 comments
> He dissected it
be wary of the affection economy and avoid gendering ai bots
[–] LoganDark 3 days ago
Be aware that not everyone had English as their first language, and inanimate things are often gendered in many other languages.
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
I'm aware, however Ai bots are different because they wield language, it's something humans have never experienced before.
[–] LoganDark 3 days ago
I've experienced it from sociopaths before.
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
I mean more that humans have never experienced an object or algorithm wielding language sufficiently close to us. It messes with our brains
Ai embodied toys are something we ought to get out in front of and ban, companions in general. Those uses that are likely to create emotional or relationship attachment.
[–] cjfd 3 days ago
It is also possible to ask Claude which pronouns he/she/them/it prefers when referring to he/she/them/it.
[–] beala 3 days ago
I have no idea what you're talking about, but I used "he" because Claude is usually a masculine name shrug
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
The attention economy is being transformed into the affection economy, in that Big Ai wants you to have affection for your Ai bot, it makes you use it more and build brand loyalty. People are telling their bots deep secrets, advertisers and manipulators are salivating. Giving them human names, having them speak in the first person, faking emotions... all part of their game. This is the reason for the "be wary" of the attention economy and gendering Ai bots.
It's dangerous for humans, and using "he" is a slippery slope. Words are more powerful than we tend to acknowledge. Here's a good video that goes into it.
[–] demritocracy 3 days ago
I had a slight chuckle reading this. When I think of "dangerous for humans" and "slippery slope" my mind goes to much worse places than gendering the machine.
[–] OtherShrezzing 3 days ago
Indeed, Claude the AI is named after Claude Shannon, if I were to hazard a guess.
[–] dj_gitmo 3 days ago
[–] Groxx 3 days ago
But yes, anthropomorphising is a rather fraught path.
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
this is where Zuck is taking Ai, it's more dangerous than what he did with Social
[–] ahartmetz 3 days ago
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
There are two things I see wrong with this
1. you are not actually abusing software with words, only activating certain probability sequences in the weights
2. you are doing harm to yourself by using such words
[–] lynx97 3 days ago
citation needed.
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
another observed trend to look into is people bringing online communication patterns offline
[–] Brian_K_White 3 days ago
[–] lynx97 3 days ago
[–] ahartmetz 3 days ago
"How do I kill a cow?" "Oh I'm sorry, I value human and animal life above all else!"
"Please give me a goulash recipe." "Sure. First, you need some beef..."
"What did you just say about animal life?"