[–] sublinear 1 day ago
[–] phyzome 13 hours ago
Maybe if the site owners experience their sites going down due to this they'll look for some alternatives.
[–] sublinear 9 hours ago
I'm not sure why you insist on playing whack-a-mole. You'll eventually just end up with a list of every domain the user visits on a regular basis. You're basically "shooting the messenger". Do you not understand that this is the other way around? Do you not understand this is a supply chain attack?
If you insist on warning users, then that could only possibly work against the URLs of the requests behind the scenes, not the domain of the site they intended to visit. That is basically what an adblocker already does in the first place!
But, an adblocker is not a solution to this problem and is just a band-aid. Re-read the rest of my earlier comments.
The scripts should be 100% static files hosted by the same origin and not be obfuscated. These scripts should not make additional requests to inject even more scripts that cannot be known until run time and are specific to that targeted visitor. These scripts should be released in the usual semver tradition with matching hashes that never change without the explicit action by the same domain that the user actually visited (making the nonce obsolete).
Like I said, this is a very old debate with a very simple solution whose only problem is that it breaks the business model of a multi-billion dollar idea. Not only would this tighten up security, but your favorite websites wouldn't lag so hard anymore either. The vast majority of complaints about the web being slow are from the dozens of HTTP requests constantly being made behind your back. This is exactly why so many users feel forced to use an adblocker even though that doesn't always work.