points by phyzome 13 hours ago | 0 comments
All of that sounds great but also it's important to protect visitors.
Maybe if the site owners experience their sites going down due to this they'll look for some alternatives.
Maybe if the site owners experience their sites going down due to this they'll look for some alternatives.
I'm not sure why you insist on playing whack-a-mole. You'll eventually just end up with a list of every domain the user visits on a regular basis. You're basically "shooting the messenger". Do you not understand that this is the other way around? Do you not understand this is a supply chain attack?
If you insist on warning users, then that could only possibly work against the URLs of the requests behind the scenes, not the domain of the site they intended to visit. That is basically what an adblocker already does in the first place!
But, an adblocker is not a solution to this problem and is just a band-aid. Re-read the rest of my earlier comments.