Hacker News
points by spullara 1 day ago | 0 comments
my 1980s 5.25" disks still work. i'm surprised but they have laster a long time.
[–] klodolph 1 day ago
I used to do floppy disk data recovery as a service for students at college. Roughly speaking, we helped one student out every three hours, out of 2,500 students, during busy hours. Based on the rates and hours, I think it would come out to something like 25% of the student body, each year, coming to us with a data loss incident involving floppy disks.

YMMV. I’m sure a lot of people were shoving these things into backpacks, and this was post-2000, so the quality of disks for sale was poorer than it was in the 90s and 80s.

I’ve also (since then, for myself) repaired drives. The drives fail because they’re mechanical and have motors, and anything that moves or has a motor in it will need some kind of service. Servicing a floppy drive requires specialized equipment which is hard to find (or requires a lot of patience—it’s possible to repair a floppy drive with just a screwdriver, but it’s not fun; guess how I know?)

[–] spullara 1 day ago
3.5" disks were much much worse.
[–] kevin_thibedeau 1 day ago
HD floppies were much worse, both 1.44MB and 1.2MB. They are just much more susceptible to defects from wear and tear because of the shrunken sector size. DD 3.5" wasn't as bad.
[–] throwaway2037 1 day ago
Do you know the reason why?
[–] klodolph 13 hours ago
I am guessing a combination of tighter manufacturing tolerances, smaller sector sizes, and manufacturers over time cheaping out would contribute to decreased reliability of 3.5" disks. People also, as far as I remember, universally used sleeves for 5.25" disks, but almost never had cases for 3.5" disks.

On the other hand, 3.5" disks have higher magnetic coercivity, which makes them less susceptible to data loss from stray magnetic fields (e.g. nearby motors).

[–] hermitdev 1 day ago
3.5" floppies were still common while I was in college. I have distinct memories of copying a project to a floppy in my dorm room, popping the disk out, walking next door (literally next door in the dorms, not even going outside up or down stairs or anything), popping the disk into a team member's PC and the project being gone. We laughed it off and chucked the disk in the trash and got another. Project wasn't lost-lost since I had a copy on my hard disk. This was also the era of the 100MB Zip Drives, which I also had in my PC and thankfully all of our lab PCs had, too. That's what I normally used for all of my day-to-day file transfers of any real import. I still have my zip disks, but I seem to have lost my zip drive, so no idea if the disks still have any data on them.
[–] sumtechguy 1 day ago
Yeah at the time. You would get the whole range of good/bad disks. Sometimes even between computers. May work just fine on one computer and not the next. It was not common but it wasnt totally rare either. Just sometimes would catch out out at silly times.

That they are still used in a critical infra item is a bit surprising. Getting new stock would be a major hassle.

[–] dam_jackalopes 1 day ago
I was on a school paper in high school and was taking photos on a "digital" camera that wrote to 3.5" floppies. Some of them are still with the (printed) copies of my articles I kept. I'll have to see if they survived.

This is probably my "I'm getting old" moment. Good lord.

[–] throwaway2037 1 day ago
Sony Mavica?
[–] deepsun 1 day ago
We used to copy files three times, better onto three separate floppies
[–] filchermcurr 1 day ago
Wow, it's crazy how experiences differ! I've never encountered anything more unreliable than zip disks. Even burned CDs lost to the dreaded buffer couldn't compete with the failure rate of those things. Past me wishes I had your luck with them, they were super cool.
[–] spullara 1 day ago
I said this in a parallel thread but 3.5" disks were much less reliable for me even in the 80s with the Amiga.
[–] throwaway2037 1 day ago
You had personal PCs but no network in a dorm?
[–] jacquesm 1 day ago
I'm placing that comment between 1985 and 1993.
[–] dd8601fn 23 hours ago
Nah. 83 is much too early for everyone having a pc in the dorm room, and well after 1993 for dorms often not having network.
[–] Jtsummers 23 hours ago
Depends on the schools for networks. I attended a college that finished adding wired networks to their dorms in 2000 or so. It just wasn't a campus priority in the 90s, fewer students had computers back then. If it was a school with more money or an engineering school they got to it earlier, the rest added it when they added it.
[–] viraptor 19 hours ago
Also depends on the environment. My dad used to repair the pre-PC computers: Amiga, Commodore, Atari, Spectrum, etc. I've had access to them before many others have even seen a computer. I've been given a really heavy, not-completely-broken and usable laptop before they became affordable for normal people.

People who grew up with or lived in the tech environment had access to lots of things.

[–] akoboldfrying 23 hours ago
Until quite recently, my Dad had a Zip drive plugged into an ancient Pentium box (back when "Pentium" meant "successor to 486"). I don't know when it was last actually used, but it's LED had been on since the 90s.
[–] jasomill 1 day ago
Sure, but what are the odds they're using these rather than HD 3.5" disks purchased from whatever new old stock they've been able to source over the past 20-odd years?
[–] mplewis 1 day ago
and how many bits have rotted on those?
[–] spullara 1 day ago
I am still able to play all the games on them and recovered my terminal program I wrote in the 80s as well:

https://github.com/spullara/pcterm128

[–] jen20 1 day ago
“Modern” disks were not that good though.