This is a linux driver problem. On laptops designed for windows.
Read the article and stop sensationalizing.
This is a problem on the MSI Prestige laptop using the RTX Spark platform and Linux. Lets assume it also applies to the Asus and Dell machines using RTX spark and Linux.
RTX Spark is a new platform and all of these laptops ship with Windows. You cant get Linux on any of these machines from the factory. NVIDIA may even ship drivers for linux later as they did with Dynamic Boost.
Kindly remove this from your list of "Evidence that NVIDIA is Colluding to Centralize Inference" and everyone else take note of this confirmation bias in action.
[–] saidnooneever 3 days ago
nvidia has always been crap like this. Look at amd and intel, they let u write proper drivers (even if its real difficult to do so). No encrypted blobs or voodoo needed.
the nvidia drivers u need to use a card on Linux are unintelligible binary blobs. thats sad as it is. this is worse. they might give some shitty blobs at some point, after they made enough ppl give up on it and switch to give them and their partners their money, souls and firstborn
[–] shevy-java 3 days ago
[–] ErroneousBosh 3 days ago
Is the problem one that could be easily countered by assuming that laptops are generally better when they're not on fire?
[–] Matl 3 days ago
No. It's 'the NVidia way or the highway' problem. NVidia is so full of themselves they refuse to work under anyone's rules (i.e. the Linux kernel where they're constantly trying to work around them).
They're egomaniacs who are so full of themselves, riding high on the AI bubble, they think they're above everyone else in the ecosystem, while utilising all kinds of other people's work for their own benefit.
Look at the way they develop their 'open' Linux drivers where it's just a shim that loads a huge binary blob off the GPU rather than a proper driver like amdgpu has.
Meanwhile they wouldn't be a $5T company without Linux and the wider FLOSS ecosystem.
It's kind of like when Secure Boot debuted and the plan was to allow only Windows with it enabled, then no doubt someone would claim the fact that only Windows can boot with it enabled as a 'Linux driver problem'.
[–] Fr0styMatt88 3 days ago
[–] mywittyname 3 days ago
Claude, make a driver that runs at full capacity on my laptop. (make no mistakes).
[–] advael 3 days ago
[–] prcrstntr 3 days ago
[–] rcxdude 3 days ago
[–] advael 3 days ago
[–] nomel 3 days ago
edit: even more important for mobile computers
[–] advael 3 days ago
[–] nomel 3 days ago
That them trying to protect IP around something very profitable isn't crazy. That not being fully supported in Linux, when the product was literally designed around Windows, also isn't crazy or really evidence of anything, including evil (see the whole fucking history of Linux compatibility of made-for-Windows hardware).
Maybe let them cook.
[–] advael 3 days ago
[–] Peaches4Rent 3 days ago
It obviously can't be because of ulterior motives!