points by advael 3 days ago | 0 comments
Protecting IP is an excuse given for all manner of computer-aided fuckery, certainly
[–] nomel 3 days ago
[–] advael 3 days ago
Yes, it seems a lot of companies can make a lot of money from fuckery like controlling what their customers can do with the devices they sell and deliberately sabotaging those devices for some customers via this control. What's your point? Am I supposed to support any practice a company can find a way to make money off of? Generally speaking I'm more against fuckery that's profitable for a company than fuckery that isn't, because the latter is at least likely to stop naturally
[–] nomel 3 days ago
> What's your point?
That them trying to protect IP around something very profitable isn't crazy. That not being fully supported in Linux, when the product was literally designed around Windows, also isn't crazy or really evidence of anything, including evil (see the whole fucking history of Linux compatibility of made-for-Windows hardware).
Maybe let them cook.
[–] advael 3 days ago
In general, the history of linux compatibility for nvidia specifically has been the research and open-source communities dragging them kicking and screaming into compliance while they do significant work to prevent compatibility via fuckery. I've been doing work impacted by this continuously since before GPGPU programming became popular. I'm not a beneficiary of nvidia's deals with microsoft or their stock price in general, so I see no reason I should "let them cook"
edit: even more important for mobile computers