points by gr33nq 4 days ago | 0 comments
Brings me back to the days of going to dgl.microsoft.com in Internet Explorer to explore the library of Clip Art graphics online. This was during the Office XP and 2003 days. Even today, that style comes across as far more authentic than the tacky AI-generated flyers you see plastered everywhere now.
[–] FDEUp 4 days ago
The Office suite during that era was very legit.
[–] Xirdus 4 days ago
[–] Terr_ 4 days ago
[–] Xirdus 3 days ago
[–] xnorswap 4 days ago
[–] DaSHacka 4 days ago
Lazily-placed text in an otherwise blank word document that gets printed and stapled haphazardly to a posterboard is infinitely preferable.
I feel similar about LLM-generated text, though that's even more egregious. If I have to get one more claude-written email from the company CEO I'm going postal. You have a slight excuse with art as most people couldn't draw to save their lives (including myself), but to write is literally to think. And, in the case of executives they have ONE job (to lead by communicating), outsourcing such a basic soft-skill focused role to AI is just pathetic.
[–] Xirdus 3 days ago
Weren't executives always outsourcing writing to their (human) assistants?
[–] Terr_ 4 days ago
Generative art and text-slop have lots of surface features which lead us to expect quality or effort, and then we're betrayed when we look closer. Our natural reaction to betrayal is to shun the actors behind it.