points by alfanick 4 days ago | 0 comments
I cannot imagine 1500+ employees "working" on this. Wtf, it's a single person project.
[–] aldanor 4 days ago
1 developer, 10 managers, 20 C-suite, 1468 sales, 1 barista
All adds up pretty well
[–] martin_a 4 days ago
For that amount of people, you should stock up on Baristi! I wouldn't want Espresso to be the bottleneck of an operation like this!
[–] dalmo3 4 days ago
And no one to deliver the mail?
[–] PcChip 4 days ago
surely they have a postman for that
[–] vincenthsin 4 days ago
Probably it is true. This is the choice of capital.
[–] MiroslavPokorny 4 days ago
This is the modern capitalist model.
So many talkers making speeches and powerpoints and nothing else.
[–] asimovDev 4 days ago
They used to have a Kombucha sommelier but they were laid off in 2023
[–] mrweasel 4 days ago
I can't even tell if you're joking or not.
[–] baobabKoodaa 4 days ago
Still sounds much better than Oracle's employee composition!
[–] SoleilAbsolu 4 days ago
Well with a proverbial lawnmower at the top of the org chart, how many sets of weed-whackers, pruning shears, leafblowers, and RoundUp dispensers are below it?!
[–] MisterMunchkin 4 days ago
Don’t forget the community manager, people lead and chaplain.
[–] dominotw 4 days ago
they are going to annouce layoffs laying of that 1 developer
[–] kklisura 4 days ago
Wait till you hear Docusign has 7k employees...
[–] colejohnson66 4 days ago
I've heard this and always wondered if most are related to compliance?
[–] Philip-J-Fry 4 days ago
[–] bartread 4 days ago
I think the argument may be that it doesn't justify this - that the main benefit of the SaaS platform has been to provide 1500+ people with something to do - and that perhaps the SaaS platform doesn't really add enough value to justify its existence or the company's valuation.
I don't really have a point of view on this since I've only used the browser extension (though I don't have it installed at present, thankfully) so the SaaS part of the business might be amazingly useful or it might not: I'm just laying out what I infer the argument in this sub-thread to be.
[–] talon8635 4 days ago
[–] jeremyjh 4 days ago
[–] boomlinde 4 days ago
[–] bdangubic 4 days ago
[–] dspillett 4 days ago
And assuming you mean Google, the question is based on a false premise. They were an advertising company years before gmail was introduced, and an ad-tech company being able to trawl your mail to find ways to advertise at you is a very different proposition to a search company releasing the same product.
[–] bdangubic 4 days ago
much like POSTMAN can trawl through all my API calls to see what other business they make from all this data they are mining now, yes?
[–] sumedh 4 days ago
[–] ex-aws-dude 4 days ago
[–] Keyframe 4 days ago
[–] ako 4 days ago