Hacker News
points by brendyn 9 hours ago | 0 comments
As much as I want my AI unbrainwashed, from what I've seen Grok is unreliable at Chinese history. This project takes Grok as its source of truth to bias/debias its answers. They do not seem to have publish actual <grok, qwen-before, qwen-after> answers to the questions particular political questions. I'd like to select some random answers and make my judgement as to if its improved or not.

From my understanding, modifications to Qwen can (in my own words): 1. remove refusals (safety abliteration) 1.2 remove political refusals (but without changing the content) 2. Political debias 3. Political rebias (aggressively manipulate answers back to some other opinion-set)

Since some studies claim they found qwen writing less secure code when it believes it isn't working for the chinese government, i mainly just want a version that isn't sabotaged, and will just give straight answers to straight questions.

Any up-to-date recommendations?

Aún no hay comentarios.
Hacker News