[–] hobofan 19 hours ago
[–] Ampersander 19 hours ago
[–] serf 19 hours ago
one could say it seems to already have budged.
[–] rvz 17 hours ago
[–] jon-wood 17 hours ago
In the case of NFSU2, a game which EA refuse to make available anywhere, I’m fine with people throwing a free version on the internet but let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. Copyright is a part of what allows small indie studios making fun things possible because it means it’s viable to sell those things and pay people’s salaries. Maybe if along with the machine god and death of copyright we also get some form of wealth distribution which means people don’t need to fund food and shelter via their work I’ll get on board but I’m not holding my breath here.
[–] xpct 16 hours ago
Then why should I trust that systems will be built that will protect my future needs?
[–] DANmode 17 hours ago
It honestly made me really sad.
I’m especially confused in the context of technology (are you familiar with the historical context of the term “hacker”? serious question!).
Yes: people do things all day every day not explicitly allowed or protected by law.
[–] thrownawaysz 19 hours ago
Steal a game and you are a pirate.
Steal 1000 games and you are OpenAI/Anthropic/Google/[insert big tech company name here]
[–] m00dy 18 hours ago
[–] DANmode 17 hours ago
Bits have been “fair game” for decades.