points by Shank 1 day ago | 0 comments
Well, I just probably am not going to use a software product named “bong” but I suppose that’s just me.
I think the issue with running something like this or SearXNG is that the good indexes will fight your efforts to use them unless you pay up and use the API. This product also suggests the google smart suggest API in the default config, which isn’t very much of a Google decoupling.
[–] polyamid23 1 day ago
What about gimp? Would you use that?
[–] niam 18 hours ago
On that basis I also avoid touch, finger, fsck, git, GIMP, lame, and coq.
[–] conorcleary 22 hours ago
I'll learn it in your stead, and figure out why along the way.
[–] conorcleary 22 hours ago
(just out of spite and DDG is stepping up like MapQuest)
We should open-source-crowdfund DDG.com to freedirect to them.
[–] DonHopkins 16 hours ago
Do you apply the same standards to windows systems and social networks spelled the same as a popular slang term for ecstasy? It's the abysimal architecture and Nazis the repell me, not the spelling.
Duckduckgo.com and bing tend to respond well as well as Staan after an account is created with them.
But what we need is competition between few large search providers, because prices now are bonkers. The only large-ish search provider that doesn't just repackaged Google or Bing is Brave, but they charge $5 for 1k requests. That is just silly. 1k will not last more than two dozen uses (each chat fires off 10-20 searches).