points by phyzome 1 day ago | 0 comments
Heck, even just perfectly comfortable whitehats will just get fed up with overly onerous reporting requirements and disclose publicly (like here).
[–] lrvick 1 day ago
[–] gchamonlive 1 day ago
You've been that guy allegedly
[–] lrvick 1 day ago
Very publicly so no allegedly to it. Not illegal to disclose vulns publicly, though I wait 90 days after vendor notification based on industry convention.
[–] gchamonlive 1 day ago
I always assume corps would put the full weight of their lawfare regardless of who's right
[–] lrvick 1 day ago
They have tried, and I have laughed at them.
"The attorney for the government should decline prosecution if available evidence shows the defendant’s conduct consisted of, and the defendant intended, good-faith security research."
https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/press-release/file/1507...
Sometimes I would rather blast a company publicly than have to sign an NDA for an often insultingly low payout.