points by soared 1 day ago | 0 comments
For all my user facing work I’m now required to do an AI summary of what I did and the impact. That summary is then graded by AI, against an AI generated rubric. For my yearly review, I use AI to summarize my summaries, and my managers AI summarizes the AI generated grades.
I’m also required to explain how I use AI in my work. I must plan all of my future work, with an AI tool. Another AI assesses whether my work is aligning with planned work.
Before I work and after I work, there is a million circular references that exist solely because of AI. These have scaled because it’s so easy to do with AI, but the we’re wasting so much time doing a ton of extra things very efficiently.
Let me do my job. My manager should know how I’m doing. Maybe highlight key wins. CSATs/etc go out every year.
[–] switchbak 1 day ago
Does any of this get read? I mean by an actual human?
This sounds truly Kafkaesque. And thank you for finally allowing me to use that word in earnest.
[–] soared 21 hours ago
The people who in theory read these are managers 3+ levels above me, so I honestly have no idea. I know my manager reads mine, but I haven’t seen any outcome from that.
[–] ctkhn 1 day ago