This is basically about as far as I feel like entertaining conspiracy theories. I think it's a fairly grounded one, compared to most.
Not claiming that a molecule or a class of such molecules (or a perfect storm of unrelated molecules acting indirectly) is behind the obesity epidemic, or that there's explicit malicious intention involved, just that it does make me wonder.
[–] bobbiechen 1 day ago
[–] owebmaster 1 day ago
Yes! It's sugar. And yes, it's highly addictive.
[–] AnthonBerg 1 day ago
I propose that it's less about the molecule and more about the receptor, and the heuristically self-balancing system and the novel environment it finds itself in.
[–] GeoAtreides 17 hours ago
sugar
[–] peterfirefly 1 day ago
[–] perching_aix 1 day ago
I find the treatment that got approved for its effect on hunger last year interesting. It's a completely different drug to semaglutide and its analogs. Quick search suggests that it's seemingly not as effective for ordinary obesity, but substantially more effective for this specific syndrome, and vice versa.
[–] cowlevel 1 day ago