Hacker News
points by drphilwinder 1 day ago | 0 comments
Thanks. What do you mean by faster here? Wall clock time?

I can't.see myself specifying 60 bits of work to work on in parallel. So I guess you're doing some kind of task decomposition.

But I'm not convinced that this is that much more efficient, given the complexity of the coordination overhead.

E.g. in my mental model, 3 big tasks takes about the same amount of time as 60 small tasks after planning and coordination.

What's your experience?

Edit: and all the harnesses do subagents pretty well now anyway, so dynamic parallelism when you need it.

[–] glennfiedler 1 day ago
Faster as in, working in parallel to reduce wall clock time. Yes, you can do some || in each harness, but I can guarantee you, you cannot out of the box work this wide across multiple models and harnesses without additional structure. That's where the nova-sprint system comes in -> https://github.com/mas-bandwidth/nova-sprint
[–] drphilwinder 16 hours ago
I appreciate the discussion. Thanks.