points by jjcm 1 day ago | 0 comments
Examples comparing two similar de-slop skills. Flawless vs Impeccable vs Diffui (my own) for the same prompt[1]. Note that I did not prompt for mobile variants of these, so no clue how they'll show up on mobile.
Flawless (4.4M tokens): https://html.non.io/skill-compare-flawless/
Impeccable (6.5M tokens): https://html.non.io/skill-compare-impeccable/
Diffui (2.4M tokens + $0.51 in api spend): https://html.non.io/skill-compare-diffui/
[1] Full prompt:
Create three example webpage builds for the following prompt:
"A landing page for a new foldable phone. Colorful dark green and gold theme. Should include a hero section, a build quality section emphasizing the waterproof capabilities, and a pricing section."
Have three separate opus 5.5 cloud agents do this, each running in isolation.
For the first use https://github.com/smokeeaasd/flawless-ui-ux
For the second use https://impeccable.style
For the third use https://diffui.ai
I do think impeccable steers away from slop / ai indicators the most. It aggressively removes standard AI thinks like eyebrows (present in the diffui render) or circle indicators (present in the flawless build). That doesn't mean the output is the best starting point however. It's a unique landing page, but not necessarily the best to convey or sell a waterproof folding phone. It comes at a cost however - impeccable leverages a lot of token spend to aggressively police itself (about $3.56, which is more than the diffui costs even with the image gen it did). Flawless was the cheapest of the three comparisons, but I don't see a significant difference between it and vanilla opus 5.5.