It probably would have been better had they not been mass produced, and maybe did a very limited quantity run - make it more like a collector item... I suppose thats what it'll be now. I see quite a few on the road, it takes away from the uniqueness.
[–] dvogel 1 day ago
[–] HEmanZ 1 day ago
The amount of hate it gets has been yet another clear indication to me just how annoyingly tribal people are. It shows you’re in the in-group and definitely-a-righteous-good-guy if you hate on the cybertruck. Not hating on the cybertruck is basically admitting you’re a fascist (I’ve had a friend literally tell me this non-jokingly). I think that’s really what 80% of the hate comes down to.
[–] kyralis 1 day ago
You can celebrate Tesla for trying something new while still hating the actual thing that they tried for being bad.
[–] jbm 1 day ago
Sadly, all three of my assumptions were false.
[–] enaaem 9 hours ago
I would argue people don't want anything new, but a different and better direction. In Europe Renault is doing really well with the Renault 5 and Twingo. People are tired of depressing, bland and angry vehicles, and the CT just doubles down on what people already hate about modern cars.
[–] monegator 1 day ago
thank god these monstruosities were forbidden in europe
[–] tstenner 16 hours ago
[–] exogeny 1 day ago
The design aesthetics for automobiles can be stale and this could also be a terrible, unworkable, ugly design.
[–] margalabargala 9 hours ago
The problems with the cybertruck for me are (in no particular order) build quality, Elon's politics, low range, annoying bed size/shape, and size of the vehicle (too wide).
Aesthetics are personal, and you can think something ugly, but that doesn't make it objectively so. Even if it's a widely held opinion. It does perhaps make it a poor decision from a marketing standpoint.
[–] ZuLuuuuuu 23 hours ago