points by arpinum 1 day ago | 0 comments
It's mainly specialties, not just levels. Are you a graphic designer that can also build your designs for the web? Were you previously consulting for our largest customer? Do you speak Welsh for our important client in Pembroke? Did you previously work in tech stack X and want to get back to it, and could lead our effort into that market? I'll pay more for these even if they come in at the same grade. Pay is very subjective, it is a prediction about the value an employee can or does bring balanced against their next best option.
[–] chaosharmonic 1 day ago
[–] arpinum 1 day ago
Because I could write 5 pages filled with these potential factors and it would be confusing to most candidates. Why specify Welsh when less than 1% of staff or candidates speak it?
[–] lelanthran 1 day ago
> Because I could write 5 pages filled with these potential factors and it would be confusing to most candidates. Why specify Welsh when less than 1% of staff or candidates speak it?
You want to set laws that hurt 99% of employees for a theoretical benefit to a 1% case for the employer?
[–] red-iron-pine 1 day ago
what's the point of a pay grade if the pay is wildly different in the same grade?
it's just multiple grades at that point masquerading behind a broken HR system
Say that no one you interview has those particulars, and you hire someone who's just -- by your regular, baseline standards -- qualified for the job. Do you have a cutoff for what you would pay those people? Then you should probably post that, and then just act like companies that comply with this stuff already and include some kind of disclaimer, that extraordinary candidates may still fall somewhere outside that range.