You are being disingenuous here. The primary and most important thing it did, was religion driven complete submission to husband and complete dependence on him.
> who are reclaiming aspects of femininity which have been stigmatized,
Which would primary be that submission and dependence part. Not gardening vs yoga, plenty of progressives have gardens and don't do yoga. Also, having kids is not stigmatized.
> but because it has a veneer of similarity to pre-feminist norms
If he beats you, it is your fault for not being obedient enough is definitely pre-feminist norm. Which is part and parcel of the culture these women embraced and are from.
[–] alyeska2 1 day ago
[–] bbatsell 1 day ago
I’m envious that you have avoided that rabbit hole, but it absolutely exists and is not niche.
[–] watwut 1 day ago
Does not imply tradwife. Tradwife has submission as unambigous part.
But also, the article is all about tradwifes influencers who were presenting beautiful life while being abused, controlled and part of religious cult. And in some cases white supremacists.
And THAT or risk of that was also primary criticism all along. Except critics talked about it as "risk" or "likelihood" rather then "you are actually lying about your reality".
Maybe I'm only seeing the cottagecore, homesteader end of the spectrum and you're only seeing the religious fundamentalist end of the spectrum, but both are happening under the same label on various TikToks, Instagrams and Podcasts.
I suspect the way you've framed it is very misleading, and represents only a tiny sliver of content, but, as I conceded in my first statement, I've seen a whole lot more commentary about tradwife content than the actual content itself, so there is a real possibility I am wrong and I've only seen the friendly tip of the iceberg but it's actually full of badness underneath.