Hacker News

points by datsci_est_2015 1 day ago | 0 comments

At least we, as users, have control of what information Claude has access to in this case:

  - Option 1: Don't give Claude the `.git` directory
  - Option 2: Build a `.git` anonymizer that overwrite git history with bogus emails

etc.

[–] fn-mote 1 day ago

That's barely control. There's going to be 100 ways your email leaks.

[–] datsci_est_2015 1 day ago

Yeah but leaking because Anthropic leaked your email vs. you underengineered your sandbox are two very different failure modes imo.

LLMs are supposed to be a panacea for building digital systems. A sandbox inside which an LLM can operate freely surely should be one of the first systems we should all strive to engineer.

If we can't properly sandbox an LLM, I would say that's a pretty good sign that LLMs are not a panacea for building digital systems.

[–] spacebanana7 1 day ago

Even if they’re not a panacea we have to accept the reality that all enterprise IT environments have at least some level of LLM exposure and figure out a way to manage the situation.