points by tikotus 1 day ago | 0 comments
I'd guess the difference is around a factor of 100 or so.
[–] antonvs 1 day ago
[–] tikotus 1 day ago
Well, you did ask for a comparison to professionals.
But I think humor is pretty easy to rate for a human. Did it make you laugh? Yes? Then it might be a good one. This simple human filter radically improves your efficiency as a joke validator, leaving any LLM far behind.
For pictures I'm not sure if humans are much better. For music, yes, after a few listens (recognizing a hit usually takes time). For games, definitely yes.
In these LLM comparisons, people tend to compare them to the best humans, not average or below average. It’s a kind of motivated reasoning, with the goal of deprecating the abilities of LLMs.