points by guar47 2 days ago | 0 comments
I agree that some of the companies do that green offsetting that doesn't achieve anything.
But it seems Ecosia does really help around the world, at least looking at their reports certainly seems so. Even if it's not a huge impact, isn't it better than nothing? How does NOT using it help anyone?
Instead, just refusing an unnecessary work trip or something once a year helps a lot more than using ecosia.
There's a problem with "feelgood as a service" when the problem is so big it needs drastic measures. It gives people the impression that there is a quick fix. Whoop, I just changed my default browser, great, I've done something to solve climate change! But still eating 300g of meat every day, meh.
That's what I object with with ecosia. They talk of "saving the planet" on their website. But on a global scale it basically does nothing.