Assuming that "tools" are the result of imperative programming, LLMs are not "tools" because they have a fundamentally different design.

And anthropomorphism is actually a precise way to describe the behavior (mind, not the structure) of LLMs.

As a matter of fact, LLMs are not configured, they're "trained".

"Moralization" is quit vague in this context, but if one treats it as a form of alignment, then LLMs certainly do have something resembling a moral(-like) framework, which is actually an important topic in modern AI research.

Antropomorphism also applies here: morals not in the human structural sense, but, as a set of norms etc., then behaviorally similar.