Hacker News
points by mmoll 2 days ago | 0 comments
The musl vulnerability looks a lot like an intentional backdoor, doesn’t it?
[–] Cakez0r 2 days ago
Choosing * instead of NULL is indeed very fishy coincidence. Of all the return values they could've picked... What are the odds?
[–] Arch485 2 days ago
About 1 in 256 I'd reckon
[–] procaryote 2 days ago
Also the coincidence of 3 weeks later adding "oh, no passwords above 256 chars" making it easy to trigger