Hacker News

points by gokaygurcan 3 days ago | 0 comments

I appreciate the suggestion but in this case I don't believe the solution to AI problem is using more AI. I personally believe what makes these lists "awesome" is the human element, not some deterministic checks that another agent could run.

[–] aftbit 3 days ago

IMO it's just like using an anti-spam filter in your email. An AI agent should never decide "Yes, this is awesome" but it surely can decide "No, this is obvious trash". Sometimes the simplest rules are best - "Did they follow the PR template? No? Ok, auto-close with a message saying that AI submissions are not allowed"

[–] NateEag 2 days ago

You don't need an agent to check if the PR matches the template.

[–] fn-mote 2 days ago

The point is: it’s easier on the humans if submissions not following the template are auto-rejected.

Or do you mean just grep for “TEMPLATE-1.3” and if it’s not there, reject?

[–] NateEag 1 day ago

Yes - a deterministic tool is just fine for verifying that a template has been followed.

It's not quite as simple as "check for one line," but it's not hard to have a useful check that costs far fewer resources to run than an agent would.

[–] Roark66 3 days ago

The deterministic check could help you filter out the chaff - prevent the human element from getting DOSed.