Hacker News
points by K0nserv 2 days ago | 0 comments
For the other part of the issue (the truncation in SHA512), in Rust you could've had:

    struct Input<'a>(&'a [u8]);
    

    impl<'a> Input<'a> {
      fn new(input: &'a [u8]) -> Result<Self, Error> {
        if input.len() >= 256 {
           return Err(Errro...);
        }
        
        Ok(Self(input))
      }
    }
Now the truncation is a terrible idea in the first place, but at least with this it would have been entirely obvious to the caller that it was there.
[–] uecker 2 days ago
In C you could do just the same: https://uecker.codeberg.page/2026-10-24.html Whether you should is a different question.

In any case, you can not change the API of an existing function. But returning NULL for error has required by POSIX would have been just fine.

Hacker News