Hacker News

points by oneeyedpigeon 2 days ago | 0 comments

I thought it was a great write up. It did feel a bit AI-coded, but whether it actually was or not, it's still a good bit of work imo.

[–] phyzome 2 days ago

I dunno, there were some strange discrepancies in the explanation (and captions). Didn't really hang together.

[–] user43928 2 days ago

Looks good overall, but I was wondering if eg. "the timer learns nothing" and "no X, no Y, no Z" was slop rather than a deliberate choice.

[–] fwip 2 days ago

Slop, no question. There's at least 10 Claudisms on the page, and I'm not that good at smelling them. Some of the sentences might have been human-written.

[–] aphysically 2 days ago

fwiw pangram believes the text is AI as well

[–] xnorswap 2 days ago

It would be weird to spend this much effort doing the site by hand, for a bug that the author says was found by a swarm of agents.