▲
Hacker News
new
|
best
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
points by
1e1a
3 days ago | 0 comments
Perhaps ping time measurements could help identify where the devices are physically located.
[–]
0cf8612b2e1e
3 days ago
If you were really sneaky, could you add some small jitter to the network responses to make it more difficult to locate?
[–]
fn-mote
3 days ago
Jitter is not a defense against statistical analysis. Additional lag might be what you want.
[–]
1e1a
3 days ago
Additional constant delay? Isn't that also easily defeated when you're measuring from multiple nodes?
[–]
adyavanapalli
3 days ago
You can only _add_ jitter. So presumably you make people think you're farther away than you really are. I guess if you're especially clever, you can manufacture responses to packets you haven't sent yet to throw people off.
[–]
Hnrobert42
3 days ago
Or just block inbound ICMP.
[–]
cowlevel
3 days ago
No. You would need to add hundreds of milliseconds depending on the sender's location.
[–] 0cf8612b2e1e 3 days ago
[–] fn-mote 3 days ago
[–] 1e1a 3 days ago
[–] adyavanapalli 3 days ago
[–] Hnrobert42 3 days ago
[–] cowlevel 3 days ago