While they have grown a bit too much, they are a natural response to the absurd amount of effort every website is pouring into anti-scraping tech.
[–] 10111001 3 days ago
[–] dabbz 3 days ago
[–] kube-system 3 days ago
Ethically, if someone just wants to play a free game and doesn't care about it, is it okay? How knowledgable does a user have to be in order to have informed consent?
[–] 10111001 3 days ago
Betcha that means there was "consent" language on page 55 of some click-through EULA.
[–] kube-system 3 days ago
[–] xyzzy_plugh 3 days ago
Help me understand. As far as I'm aware, these residential proxies are almost always malware.
[–] OptionX 3 days ago
Residential proxies are in many cases at least shady, both on the side of who uses them and for what and on providers that are often not above using dark pattern to hide them in some innocuous app for a smart-whatever that silently runs a proxy on a unaware user's connection. And in many places in the world if illegal stuff in done using your connection you are liable, regardless if you knew about it.
[–] georgel 3 days ago
But getting around it sure is annoying, sometimes I get flagged IP's from Comcast and can't visit sites like costco.com despite not doing any questionable stuff on my network.
[–] mcmcmc 3 days ago
[–] sparkling 3 days ago
Maybe some people do not want to provide their entire website as free training material to [insert LLM lab here]?
[–] ethin 3 days ago
[–] anonreplier 3 days ago
[–] ethin 3 days ago
[–] anonreplier 2 days ago
[–] lakeviewterrace 3 days ago
> and can be used for extra anonymity
Great, so you can conduct illegal transactions and have some unsuspecting grandma take the blame and have her front door kicked in?
[–] kube-system 3 days ago
[–] lakeviewterrace 3 days ago
They didn't just connect a coffee pot to their WiFi one day.
[–] kube-system 3 days ago
[–] timacles 3 days ago
Technically correct statement though
[–] benjojo12 3 days ago
[–] lakeviewterrace 3 days ago
[–] mcmcmc 3 days ago
[–] mikestew 3 days ago
So important that we have to trick people into using them. Remember when folks were running SETI@Home? Of course you do, because it was widely thought to be a good thing, and folks willingly signed up.
How many would buy the "box" if the advertising were honest about what's actually in the box?
Aren't they almost always run unknowingly, by people tricked into running them?