Hacker News

points by theandrewbailey 3 days ago | 0 comments

Maybe this helps answer the question of 'where did the bugs go', because windshields aren't as full of them today compared to 20-30 years ago.

[–] cbg0 3 days ago

The answer to that is pesticides. There's still plenty of insects ready to smash into your windshield in many parts of the world.

[–] silisili 3 days ago

I wonder what percentage is pesticides vs development? I currently live in an area(US) where a drive to the nearest city of size absolutely coats my car in bugs. US, mostly farmland(soybeans/corn). I wasn't here 30 years ago so can't say there's as many as then, likely not. But if it were only pesticides I'd expect the rural areas to have less bugs than the more developed areas...

[–] aeonfox 3 days ago

As someone who has made many interstate trips through Australia's farmland, I can say that over the decades there's definitely been a drop in windshield splatter. It's unsurprising that pesticide deployed at scale reduces bug populations. Even herbicides which aren't intended as insecticides have limited product advantage to being bug-safe (apart from pollinated crops... and even then). Some aren't even human-safe. An extreme example is paraquat, that while being a herbicide, is irreversibly deadly to humans^ when consumed even in tiny amounts.

^ Obligatory Chubbyemu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VtUGoGZtI8

[–] dylan604 3 days ago

I would lean towards the urbanization of the land as well. I rarely get bugs on my car in the city, but as soon as I head out to the country at night my car is covered. I had to stop at a gas station back in May not for gas but just to squeegee the windscreen so I could see again.

[–] arcfour 3 days ago

Pesticides weren't in use 20-30 years ago? Wouldn't more dangerous pesticides have been in use then, too, compared to now?

[–] roromainmain 3 days ago

They have been used much more massively since the 80s, price decreased significantly.

[–] mcmcmc 3 days ago

Yes, and advancements have made them both safer and more effective

[–] baoooooooooooo 3 days ago

wow this would be a neat twist if true - we all defaulted to the negative explanation of having killed them all where a much more positive explanation might be that we're no longer luring them to their deaths at the leading edge of automobiles?

I guess it is most likely some combination of the above, but if there's any evidence it would be a neat reframing

[–] faidit 3 days ago

Colorado: "Insect biomass declined by ∼47% and abundance declined by ∼61.5% over the last 35 years." https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2...

Germany: "More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas" https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...

Puerto Rico: "dry weight biomass of arthropods captured in sweep samples had declined 4 to 8 times, and 30 to 60 times in sticky traps." https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1722477115

[–] HelloMcFly 3 days ago

The mass insect-death on windshield issue was as much a daytime issue and nighttime one.

[–] amelius 3 days ago

Are you sure about that?

[–] HelloMcFly 3 days ago

I am not making any claims about the relative prevalence of insects day vs. night.

I can say with absolute and total confidence that the phenomenon of insect splatter was a common - if not frequent - daytime experience. I've not experienced this phenomenon in decades.

[–] Angostura 3 days ago

Yes. The daytime crop was always greater than at night

[–] mahboi 3 days ago

The McFlies don't think very much

[–] calt 3 days ago

My hypothesis is better wind tunnel testing for modern cars so that the bugs go over instead of splatting.

[–] filoeleven 3 days ago

> The second survey, in the UK county of Kent in 2019, examined splats in a grid placed over car registration plates, known as a “splatometer”. This revealed 50% fewer impacts than in 2004. The research included vintage cars up to 70 years old to see if their less aerodynamic shape meant they killed more bugs, but it found that modern cars actually hit slightly more insects.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/12/car-spla...

[–] dylan604 3 days ago

I'd go with fewer people having experience driving not in a city, at least in this forum making the claims as GP

[–] r721 3 days ago

There's a Wikipedia entry for that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windshield_phenomenon

[–] filoeleven 3 days ago

> Research also found that modern cars with a more aerodynamic body shape killed more insects than boxier vintage cars.

That was a surprise to me! I checked out the Wikipedia article to see if it said "lower numbers are attributed to more aerodynamic windshields," because as a former Scion xB driver for 15+ years I saw the number of splats drop quite a lot. The area I lived in was undergoing a massive shift from farmland to housing developments too though, so I couldn't extrapolate further.

[–] dylan604 3 days ago

I think they just all collectively got tired of hearing my dad's punny about "it doesn't have the guts to do that again" any time a bug squashed on the windscreen.