Hacker News
points by rwz 3 days ago | 0 comments
Serious question: How does this worldview survive a collision with a stereotypical cancer-cure argument? Like, a pharmacological company needs to invest billions into R&D to invent a drug curing cancer. Without any kind of patent mechanism they will never be able to justify this kind of investment, cause the minute the release their drug, others can reverse engineer it and start selling generics of it for fraction of the cost because they never had to pay upfront R&D.
[–] patrakov 3 days ago
And the minute they don't release their drug, others will use AI to make their own version, even better.
[–] pona-a 3 days ago
Who's going to pay for collecting all the actual medical data, AI Jesus? Maybe the universities? Great, we agree R&D is best handled by public institutions funded by the taxpayer. But something tells me you wouldn't agree with me...

I swear most AI booster arguments can work about as well if we replace AI with the Holy Spirit.

(Apologies if this was sarcasm, I genuinely can't tell these days...)