They don't give you the actual reasoning, they use a smaller model to produce a slop summary. (They don't want you seeing all the MITM stuff anthropic injects into the chain of thought)
> Opus decided I was looking to pick out exactly two of the issues.
In this specific case, does it matter if you get the raw reasoning vs a "slop summary"? I bet both would tell you that Opus locked into two issues no matter how bad the slop summary is.
In this specific case, does it matter if you get the raw reasoning vs a "slop summary"? I bet both would tell you that Opus locked into two issues no matter how bad the slop summary is.