> The biggest change has been Google’s AI summary. Google’s first or second result is almost always an AI summary, and it’s usually decent.

Honestly this makes me skeptical of the whole piece. I get a pretty strong Gell-Mann amnesia effect from it[0]. It is not quite reliable enough that you can trust it, as when it is wrong it tends to be VERY wrong. In addition it is not like 99% accurate or something, but closer to like 80-90% or something.

[0]: The phenomenon of a person trusting newspapers for topics which that person is not knowledgeable about, despite recognizing the newspaper as being extremely inaccurate on certain topics which that person is knowledgeable about.