Hacker News
points by drysine 4 days ago | 0 comments
>it [C++] was solving architectural problems

What do you mean?

[–] fps-hero 2 days ago
Think about the difference in how you would structure a program if it was coded in C++/Java vs C. C++ was an enabler of object oriented programming.
[–] drysine 1 day ago
About the same, I think)
[–] fps-hero 5 hours ago
I think what is obvious now wasn’t obvious then. If you think about how Linux and the open source community rallied around C, this was at complete odds to what was being taught at a university level. It’s a miracle C survived (if I only through new C++ programmers thoroughly rejecting its promise and sticking to “safe C++”). Even still, rust is a solution to memory lifetime problems with a modern toolset, it’s not solving ergonomic problems which is how you attract new developers. Similarly, ADA was a better language, probably pascal too, they didn’t win.