That's how I read it nowadays, as Google search results are in a quality going down trend.
[–] runarberg 5 days ago
[–] fhn 4 days ago
[–] verdverm 5 days ago
Actual search results are still bad. Seems to be a trend across most engines
[–] anonova 5 days ago
[–] verdverm 5 days ago
the direction they want to go is clear for me, similar to proton
[–] gyulai 4 days ago
These are still a thing for people who don't like JavaScript, so I'd give them some credit.
And it's not like these don't cost anything to run and maintain. Quite the contrary: bots love to use them, and it screws with their ads-driven business model. And yet they are still keeping these around.
I think that "noai", too, will keep going for a long time.
[–] verdverm 4 days ago
very google-y to me, or valley-y is probably more accurate, par for the course across so many products these days (in your face)
[–] ddejohn 4 days ago
[–] charcircuit 5 days ago
[–] collinmcnulty 5 days ago
[–] verdverm 5 days ago
DDG pulls stunts too
I'm moving to API based search options, using multiple, and rendering them as markdown for myself or my agent
[–] lokar 5 days ago
[–] shevy-java 4 days ago
I noticed the same with Qwant. They even try to copy the useless UI for Google. And on top of that I get a 2 seconds delay "verifying device".
It seems nobody knows how to create a proper search engine anymore. Google search is also useless compared to "the good old days".
[–] Dwedit 5 days ago
[–] verdverm 5 days ago
I'm using API search like EXA, the incentives feel more aligned
[–] notabotiswear 5 days ago