Hacker News
points by kenjackson 5 days ago | 0 comments
It says this “All of this is possible without allowing Astra to write training loops. It uses its reasoning to figure out what each part of a neural network computes, or should compute, and changes the weights accordingly.”

This seems 100% accurate to me. What is a lie here?

[–] stymaar 5 days ago
Nobody said they outright “lied”, most misleading statements are “100% accurate” yet are designed to mislead the reader.

And when you see the reactions in the HN comment to the original article, it's pretty clear that most people have indeed been mislead.

[–] nextaccountic 5 days ago
The article is not misleading either.

The title is but then OP should talk about just the title instead

[–] stymaar 5 days ago
The title and the abstract are, the article is fine (but disappointing, given the excitement built up by the title + abstract)